DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490
BAN
Docket No:NRO07422-13
2 December 2013
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of ‘Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy
Ref: (a) Title 10 U.5.C. 1552
Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/fattachments
(2) Navy Personnel Command (NPC) memo 1430 ser 811/345
of 5 Nov 2013
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed
enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the
applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was
advanced to E-5 from the February 2011 Navy-wide Reserve
advancement cycle.
2, The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman and
Exnicios reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and
injustice on 22 November 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be
taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice,
finds as follows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted ail
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office
having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in
Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the
request has merit and warrants favorable action.
CONCLUSION
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
Docket No.NRO7422-13-
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board
finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following
corrective action.
RECOMMENDATION :
That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate,
as follows:
a. Petitioner was advanced to E-5/LS2 from the February
2011 Navy-wide Reserve examination with an effective date of 16
July 2011 and a Titme In Date of 1 July 2011.
Note: This correction will require his command to
administratively correct all evaluations from 16 July 2011 to
present to reflect E-5 vice E-4..
b. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in
Petitioner’s naval record.
4, Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was
present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s
proceedings in the above entitled matter.
ROBERT D. Z2SALMAN BRONTE I. Mon MER
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
W. "DEAN PFEI
Executive Dikéc
2 December 2013
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5391-13
Be DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket :NRO05391-13 16 September 2013 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records TO: Secretary of the Navy el Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 16 September 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7121 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-5 from the February 2013 Navy-wide Reserve advancement cycle. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 22 November 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7714 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-6 from the August 2011 Navy-wide Reserve advancement cycle. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman and Rxnicios reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 22 November 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4691-13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-6/BM1 from the February 2012 Navy-wide Reserve advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 3 September 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5165-13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-6/MA1 from the February 2012 Navy-wide Reserve advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 3 September 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4583-13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-6/HM1 from the September 2010 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and ; injustice on 30 September 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5858-13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-5/ABH2 from the September 2011 Navy-wide advancement cycle. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 15 October 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4748-13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that she was advanced to E-4/HT3 from the March 2011 Navy-wide advancement exam cycle. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 3 September 2013, and, pursuant to its reguiations, determined that the partial corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3502-13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the . The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 13 August 2013, and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the partial corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2970 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that her Performance Mark Average (PMA) for the September 2011 Navy-wide advancement exam cycle 212 should have been 3.8 vice 3.7. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 July 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...